A Google user
Sad that such a scholarly attempt should miss the obvious, available even on Google search.Strabo, the Roman historian writes, with apparent disdain for laymen, 'Concerning the merchants who sail from Egypt..even to the Ganges, they are only private citizens, and know nothing about the history of the places the visit.
Why else would merchants sail to the Ganges, which early maps clearly mark, accuraytely, in not, as 'The eriplus of the Erithraen Sea', published about 50AD, su ggests that the Ganges is where 'raw silk, from an inland city called Thina, may be acquired'.
So many writers, jumping on the Silk Road bandwagon, ignore the obvious, that if the roadways of the ancient world were water, the Soouthwest Silk Road..Sichuan, Yunnan, Myanmar, Assam, Brahmaputra River, with variations, was the shortest land route to the headwaters of Yangtze River, and Chinese coast, proably from at least the middle of 1st Millennium BCE.
The ganges basin civilisation from 2nd Millennium BCE wa one of the earliest centres in the world of manufacturing and trade, and the Ganges Delta would have been agreat centre of trade from earliest times.
So what can one say of such poor research and investigation?